doc: delete long-obsolete README.ARM-memory-map
As far back as 2011, "_armboot_start" was being described as "no
longer defined":
 commit 297f18ac0f
 Author: Greg Ungerer <greg.ungerer@opengear.com>
 Date:   Fri Sep 9 22:23:34 2011 +1000
   CM4000: fix broken flash base for OpenGear boards
   Use _bss_start_ofs as the size of the boot loader code+data that we want
   to protect in the flash. This replaces use of the no longer defined
   _armboot_start.
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									71d8e1b829
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						9ad996adcc
					
				| 
						 | 
					@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
 | 
				
			||||||
Subject: Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviour
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
From: "Anders Larsen" <alarsen@rea.de>
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:21 +0200
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
...
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
>I still see  references  to  _armboot_start,  _armboot_end_data,  and
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
>_armboot_end - which role do these play now? Can we get rid of them?
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
>
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
>How are they (should they be) set in your memory map above?
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
_armboot_start contains the value of CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE (0xA07E0000); it seems
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE and _armboot_start are both used for the same purpose in
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
different parts of the (ARM) code.
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
Furthermore, the startup code (cpu/<arm>/start.S) internally uses
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
another variable (_TEXT_BASE) with the same content as _armboot_start.
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
I agree that this mess should be cleaned up.
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue